Obama’s going to save you just like he did for his own family.

Isn’t his bother one of the “little people” he cares so much about?

H/T Doctor Bulldog and Ronin


So Obama really was working with ACORN…

From the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review.

“HARRISBURG — A former staffer for an affiliate of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now testified today that the organization was provided a “donor list” from the presidential campaign of Barack Obama in late 2007 for fundraising efforts.”

And here I thought he had nothing to do with those people.  The funny thing is that the same people who are trying to rig the election are going to claim the election was rigged if Obama loses.

Obama’s “Uncle Frank” was a drug dealing communist pedophile who knew?

Jerome R. Corsi at WorldNetDaily has a nice little article explaining all the happiness about one of Obama’s mentors.

Does Obama have any friends, mentors or coworkers that can’t embarrass him?  Really this guy has the worst judgment when it comes to friends.   By this point the pattern should be very obvious on the kind of people Obama hangs out to anyone who is really paying attention.  Yeah vote for Obama what could it hurt…

H/T Dr. Bulldog

The Weather Underground’s plans for gulags and mass murder

Well it’s only 25 million people killed and that isn’t really that big of a number if you consider how many people are on this planet right?

Taking July 1, 1970 as a reference point the estimated U.S. Population was around 205,052,174. So if you killed 25 million people that would be about 12% of the population (OK my math might be wrong here feel free to correct it).

Yes Ayers and his friends had been planning on killing at least 12% of the U.S. population after they overthrew the U.S. Government.  Now I know why I haven’t been able to get the song Holiday in Cambodia out of my head for weeks.  Only it goes something like “it’s a Holiday in America where you’ll do what you’re told…”

Well you get the point.

One Death Is A Tragedy; A Million Is A Statistic. -Joseph Stalin

Now I finally know how we all got set up.

“The strategy of forcing political change through orchestrated crisis. The “Cloward-Piven Strategy” seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse.”

Read the whole thing it’s good information on Obama and it is a lot of fun.

H/T Velvet Hammer

Michelle Obama on Barak running for President

This was in late 2004 and since the guy has been running for President since 2006 how much has he done since then?

H/T Velvet Hammer

Former Associate Deputy Director of the FBI claims Obama couldn’t get a security clearance or a job at the FBI

Here are some gold nuggets from the Family Security Matters interview with Buck Revell, the former Associate Deputy Director of the FBI who was in charge of all FBI operations until 1994.

FSM: It has been said that Sen. Obama would not be able to get a security clearance now if he applied for one because of the many relationships he has had in the past, and now, with people like Khalid al-Mansour and Bill Ayers. Is that true?

BR: Well, of course, all I can do to render my opinion is to the time I served in government, and I retired after 35 years in 1994. But at one time I was the Assistant Director in charge of the administrative division of the FBI, which as part of its duties was hiring and clearing personnel, and certainly we would not have hired during my tenure a person that had the background, associates and relationships that Obama has had over his adult life.

Now, that’s not saying that he has engaged in any illegal or improper activity, but when you associate with people of the likes of Bill Ayers, who is not only a known radical but an unrepentant radical, and teaches a radical socialism – some would say communist – approach to government, and espouses the use of violence if “necessary,” and he determines when it’s necessary, this is not the kind of person that an association with – and an association that was both voluntary and lengthy – would give you the necessary satisfaction that the applicant himself was not involved to some degree or at least acknowledged and agreed with parts of that person’s social or political agenda…

By what has been reported and to some degree acknowledged, would in my view, have disqualified him for a position in the FBI based upon the fact that he wouldn’t have qualified for a security clearance.

FSM: It sounds to me that the FBI operates less on the idea of “guilt by association” and more on the idea of “a man is known by the company he keeps.”

BR: It’s not guilt by association, but it’s essentially if you associate with people on a continuing basis who have posed a threat to our nation by either advocating anarchy and/or an overthrow of the government or who are racist and advocate the potential of racial conflict or who are engaged in criminal activities, then you have not shown good judgment. You have not shown that you are the kind of person who can differentiate between those who are appropriate to associate with and those who are not. So on the basis of the judgment issue, and then of course, if you found any specific activity, you’d judge that as well. But just the judgment in continuing to associate with people that he knew were engaging in racist and radical, violence-prone socialist activities would be sufficient to disqualify him from consideration for the top secret clearance and the FBI position…

FSM: Considering this situation we find ourselves in today, do you think presidential candidates should be vetted more before they are allowed even to run for their party’s nomination?

BR: Well that’s very difficult to say how you would do that – no elected official – senator or congressman or the vice president or president – goes through a security clearance process. The very election process itself is considered vetting. Now there have been many members of congress that we would not provide information to. Even though they are entitled to a security clearance doesn’t mean that agencies that have discretion would trust them, and we knew that there were some that we could not trust. With the president and the vice president you really have no choice but to provide the information unless and until you determine that it’s being abused and then you have to take the action of going to the attorney general, and if the attorney general won’t act, you go to the oversight committees of the Congress to explain that there have been inappropriate actions taken on highly sensitive and classified information…”

Yes Obama wants to be be president and yet he wouldn’t be eligible for even a low level security clearance.  Granted the President doesn’t need a clearance but what does it say about the man who wants to be President if the Federal Government doesn’t think he can be trusted with even a low level clearance.

There is more to the interview and I recommend you read the whole thing.

H/T to  PA Pundits for this one.

I hate it here…